On 8 March 2011 02:54, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> writes: >> On 7 March 2011 23:30, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Maybe we could say "the name or OID of a table", or some such phrase, >>> so as to subtly avoid the expectation that what is being referred to >>> is the datatype named "name"? > >> Yes, that would remove the ambiguity. :) > > That wording turned out not to work well in context, at least not > without major surgery on the containing sentences. I decided that > the best way was to just say "specified table" in the function tables, > and then borrow the paragraph that explains about regclass > arguments from the sequence-functions page.
Thanks Tom. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
