Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:50:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (looks at the whole section) As-is, it's definitely not good, because
>> before there were three independent examples, and now there are three
>> and a half --- the added example depends on the variables declared in
>> the third example. But using the blank line means you've formatted it
>> as a stand-alone fourth example, which is not only wrong in itself but
>> it screws up the meanings of both of the subsequent paragraphs.
> OK, how is this? The C comment allows me to add 'or'.
It's still completely failing to address the problem that it's formatted
as a fourth, independent example. Please remove the blank line.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
