On 16 May 2013 17:33, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> writes: >> Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example >> attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended >> panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's >> still probably wrong. > > At least it would grate on somebody's nerves once they'd noticed it. > Fixed in HEAD.
Thanks Tom. Also, s/panagram/pangram/ in my own email. Thom -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
