Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> writes:
> Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example
> attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended
> panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's
> still probably wrong.
At least it would grate on somebody's nerves once they'd noticed it.
Fixed in HEAD.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
