> That note has been there forever, in particular since before we > supported CONCURRENTLY, which is pretty darn important in many uses > nowadays. Since it seems like some users have taken this suggestion > seriously, e.g. on stackoverflow[1], how about we remove this outdated > suggestion? There is already a previous mention a few sections > earlier[2] suggesting the use of CONCURRENTLY, so I don't think we > really need to reiterate that suggestion here.
+1 -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
