On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 03:10:46PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > That note has been there forever, in particular since before we > > supported CONCURRENTLY, which is pretty darn important in many uses > > nowadays. Since it seems like some users have taken this suggestion > > seriously, e.g. on stackoverflow[1], how about we remove this outdated > > suggestion? There is already a previous mention a few sections > > earlier[2] suggesting the use of CONCURRENTLY, so I don't think we > > really need to reiterate that suggestion here. > > +1
Patch applied through 9.5. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
