Hi Tom, On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 11:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Hm ... my RHEL6 machine, which certainly can build the documentation, > hasn't got either of those: <snip>
> So evidently Red Hat has refactored their TeX RPMs since then. > I don't doubt Devrim's conclusions are good for recent Red Hat > releases, Right, I tested on Fedora 26, and then on RHEL 7. Sorry. > but we might want to add some weasel wording saying > that the required package set has moved around. > > Personally, my longstanding habit has been to select the > "Authoring & Publishing" package set when installing any new > RHEL or Fedora box, and as far as I can recall, that's always > Just Worked for building PG docs. Maybe we should mention > that strategy as a preferable one. This will install extra packages, which are not needed, but given that very few people will install this set, I am fine with this solution. Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
