Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for PostgreSQL.
Bottom line: you charge for *services**you provide* not for software that
other people provide.
On 9/18/19 5:11 PM, Ashkar Dev wrote:
Thanks,
but is it legal to charge for installing PostgreSQL?
as you said:
You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL
should I in the contract write that the price does not include installing
PostgreSQL, preparing it or PostgreSQL itself?
or just from my side while I am going to set price I have to dont count
installing the PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL itself as a part of that price?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Rob Sargent <robjsarg...@gmail.com
<mailto:robjsarg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:
> Hi all thanks,
> I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for
> example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was
> created by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to
> deliver the product to him can I sell the package that contains web
> app files with PostgreSQL software and the database code?
>
You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license),
installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting
your web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any
maintenance and support you care to specify. You can copy-right your app
and schema and data.
You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
