Added to TODO.
> "Philip Poles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm having some trouble using a hash index on an INT8 field in
> > postgres7.0(release):
>
> Looks like we don't have a hash function defined for int8 :-(.
> This is going to have to stay broken until 7.1, given our rule
> against changing system catalogs for subreleases. Sorry.
>
> Just counting entries, that may not be the only type that has
> entries in pg_amop but not pg_amproc. I feel another oprsanity
> regression-test check coming on...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
