>----- Original Message ----
>From: Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Shelby Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Terry Yapt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
>pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 1:08:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32)
>
>Not that wild a guess, really :-) I'd say it's a very good possibility -
>but I have no idea why it'd do that, since all backends load the same
>DLLs at that stage.
>
>//Magnus
>

Assuming this is an issue with shared libraries, I think it would
have more to do with the way Windows resolves address conflicts on process
startup than anything caused by explicit calls to LoadLibrary().  Looking
at postgres.exe with the dependency viewer from
Visual Studio 6, I see that the following shared library dependencies
embedded in the executable image that having conflicting base
addresses.  If I'm not mistaken, Windows will automatically relocate
these libraries prior to actual code execution so there would be no
opportunity for that particular instance of postgres.exe to map the shared 
memory if the address
space is already in use by a relocated dll.







libeay32.dll - 0x10000000



libiconv-2.dll - 0x10000000



libintl-2.dll - 0x10000000



ssleay32.dll - 0x10000000



comerr32.dll - 0x1c000000



krb5_32.dll - 0x1c000000







I also found a KB article that specifically addresses ERROR_INVALID_MEMORY 
being returned from MapViewOfFileEx().  







http://support.microsoft.com/kb/125713





The article specifically addresses the concern where multiple processes
must use
the same address for mappings and how to accomplish that under
Windows.  Search for "Addresses of Mapped Views".  The only thing that
really gives me any pause is the fact the article hasn't been updated
past the NT 3.51/Windows 9x era but the underlying behavior might not have been 
changed in Windows 2000/XP/etc.







Regards,







Shelby Cain








       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for 
today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to