On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:10:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > > Is there a reason the following patch wasn't applied? > > I don't think anybody ever did the legwork to verify it was a good idea. > In particular, it'd be good to check if sending a tabstat message for each > table adds noticeable overhead.
OK, I will mark it as closed then. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
