Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:10:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
>>> Is there a reason the following patch wasn't applied?
>> I don't think anybody ever did the legwork to verify it was a good idea.
>> In particular, it'd be good to check if sending a tabstat message for each
>> table adds noticeable overhead.
> OK, I will mark it as closed then. Thanks.
I don't know that it should be closed exactly --- if we don't do this,
we should do something else about the performance issue. Maybe put it
on TODO?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
