On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +1200, Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti wrote: > We're fairly confident that it's an issue with the hardware but we > have political reasons to downgrade PG to 9.2.10 to show the hosting > supplier that it's their fault. > > > The release notes for 9.2.11 mention no data structure changes (in > line with the usual PG versioning policy). Is it just as safe to > downgrade too? We tested it on a couple non-critical boxes to no ill > effect whatsoever, but we'd like a second opinion before we do it on > the live installation too.
I have rarely seen this question asked. I think minor-release downgrading is fine in this case. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
