I hate to ask the obvious, but have you made sure you copied over the postgresql.conf and pg_hba.conf to make it identical?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +1200, Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti wrote: > > We're fairly confident that it's an issue with the hardware but we > > have political reasons to downgrade PG to 9.2.10 to show the hosting > > supplier that it's their fault. > > > > > > The release notes for 9.2.11 mention no data structure changes (in > > line with the usual PG versioning policy). Is it just as safe to > > downgrade too? We tested it on a couple non-critical boxes to no ill > > effect whatsoever, but we'd like a second opinion before we do it on > > the live installation too. > > I have rarely seen this question asked. I think minor-release > downgrading is fine in this case. > > -- > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + Everyone has their own god. + > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- *Melvin Davidson* I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
