Melvin Davidson wrote: > "seriously flawed" is a bit of a stretch. Most sane developers would not > have schema names of one letter. > They usually name a schema something practical, which totally avoids your > nit picky exception.
That's confusing the example with the problem it shows. Another example could be: if the source schema is "public" and the function body contains GRANT SELECT on sometable to public; then this statement would be wrongly altered by replace(). My objection is not about some corner case: it's the general idea of patching the entire body of a function without a fully-fledged parser that is dead on arrival. Best regards, -- Daniel Vérité PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org Twitter: @DanielVerite -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
