On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 01:44:37PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote: > 1) Are helpful when I ask a question > 2) Stick to the topic > 3) Don't get into petty etiquettes like "Please stop top posting" > and if you really need to - A polite we prefer top posting would do > > 4) Are sensitive to people on other operating systems other than your > preferred.
That seems like a pretty good scratch CoC to me. (See my other note about how other communities deal with this.) It's concrete, short, to the point, and a useful thing to point to when some flamewar breaks out over irrelevant stuff. If people want a CoC, I think it should be something like the above. > My other concern about CoCs is I fear someone is going to come and demand > we change Master/Slave to Leader/Follower, because Master is a male term > and Slave is insensitive to grand-children of slaves. If someone did that, it would fall under (2), no? (I note that a recent RFC, of which I am a co-author, about DNS terminology did say that "primary" and "secondary" were to be preferred over "master" and "slave". I didn't personally agree with the claim, but that's what got consensus.) Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
