> On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:20 AM, Yogesh Sharma
> <yogesh1.sha...@nectechnologies.in> wrote:
> Dear John and all,
> >8.1 has been obsolete and unsupported for about 6 years now. 8.1.18 was
> >released in 2009, the final 8.1.23 release was in 2010, after which it was
> Yes, we understood your point.
> But we require some information related to this rpm.
> >These errors suggest disk file corruption, this can occur from unreliable
> >storage, undetected memory errors, and other such things.
> How we can verify what is actual problem in system?
> Also please share some information related to below.
> we tried to stop the postgresql but it couldn’t stop and timout after 60 sec.
> please confirm below message in postgre logs.
> FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command
> From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:28 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request to share information regarding postgresql
> pg_xlog file.
> On 9/14/2016 10:09 PM, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for your support and suggestion.
> We are using below postgresql rpm.
> thats not the full RPM name, thats just the version.
> 8.1 has been obsolete and unsupported for about 6 years now. 8.1.18 was
> released in 2009, the final 8.1.23 release was in 2010, after which it was
> current releases are 9.1 (soon to be obsoletted), 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, and 9.5,
> with 9.6 in release candidate state.
> CONTEXT: writing block 53 of relation 1663/16385/280951
> ERROR: could not open relation 1663/16385/280951: No such file or directory
> These errors suggest disk file corruption, this can occur from unreliable
> storage, undetected memory errors, and other such things.
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
What operating system is this running on? John is most likely correct: the disk
is not healthy. How you deal with that depends on your OS
Are you looking for the rpm for that version? Or do you have some other reason
for asking about the rpm versus questions about the postgres version
This list requests that you “bottom post” i.e. add your comments to the bottom,
not the top. (I don’t like it, but that’s the protocol here)