Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

[Tim Barnard]

Wow, I didn't realize I was going to open such a big can of worms :-)   Thanks to everyone for putting in their "two-cents worth." All of the responses have definitely been helpful. And I agree with Adam, et al, this really doesn't belong on this list so lets end this thread and move on.   Thanks again.   Tim   ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Barnard" <tbarnard@povn.com> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL On 27 Jun 2001, Tim Barnard wrote: <snip> ...This is not the same in my book, since I don't care to run RHL in any kind of production environment... <snip> What is it about RHL that various people wouldn't recommend running it in a production envornment? I don't have a contrary view, so much as I'd like to know what's specifically wrong with the RH distribution. We're trying to decide on a distribution on which to develop telecom software, utilizing PostgreSQL of course :-) What other distributions would you recommend and why? Tim