> Previous to version 7.1, RHL wasn't very secure by default. This is one of > the most common complaints I hear. 7.1 can be made quite secure out of the > box without any special config -- just leave the firewall config at the > default of 'HIGH' -- of course, I've now heard complaints that it is then > 'too secure' :-). Myself, I'd prefer that they'd just leave the insecure services off by default, rather than using a firewall as a "band-aid". ; ) steve ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Tim Barnard
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Philip Molter
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support Post... Philip Molter
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support Post... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support Post... Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Tim Barnard
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support Post... Steve Wolfe
- RE: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Tim Mickol
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- RE: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreS... Tim Mickol