On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 1:21 PM Lakshmi N <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 8:31 PM Amit Langote <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 11:49 AM Hu Xunqi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 10:16 AM Amit Langote <[email protected]> 
>> > wrote:
>> > +       /*
>> > +        * Reject invalid databases: datconnlimit = -2 would be emitted as
>> > +        * CONNECTION LIMIT = -2, which cannot be executed.
>> > +        */
>> >
>> > This comment looks a bit too centered on datconnlimit=-2, but the real 
>> > issue is that an invalid pg_database row should not be deparsed into DDL. 
>> > So, maybe rephrase like:
>> >
>> > /*
>> > * Reject invalid databases. Deparsing a pg_database row in invalid state
>> > * can produce SQL that is not executable, such as CONNECTION LIMIT = -2.
>> > */
>>
>> I was trying to be precise about datconnlimit = -2 being the thing
>> that produces invalid SQL. But your version covers that with the "such
>> as CONNECTION LIMIT = -2" example, and it's closer to the original,
>> which was on the right track, just needed to be more precise. Let's go
>> with it.
>
> This looks good to me. Thank you for reviewing and making the changes!

Pushed.

-- 
Thanks, Amit Langote


Reply via email to