On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I think what I had meant to write was something like > > (t.tgtype & (1 | 66)) > > but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did.
If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
