On 2018-02-07 10:50:12 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2/7/18 00:14, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> I think what I had meant to write was something like > >> > >> (t.tgtype & (1 | 66)) > >> > >> but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did. > > > > If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the > > formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that > > ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics. > > Committed with the separate entries.
Do we have a policy about catversion bumps for information schema changes? A cluster from before this commit fails the regression tests after the change, but still mostly works... Greetings, Andres Freund