On 2018-02-07 10:50:12 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/7/18 00:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> I think what I had meant to write was something like
> >> (t.tgtype & (1 | 66))
> >> but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did.
> > If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the
> > formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that
> > ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics.
> Committed with the separate entries.
Do we have a policy about catversion bumps for information schema
changes? A cluster from before this commit fails the regression tests
after the change, but still mostly works...