On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 23:39:34 -0800
Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2018-02-19 17:00:34 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > I have a hard time understanding how adding yet another autovacuum
> > table-level knob makes the DBA's life any easier. Especially when
> > the behavior is so unreliable and does not really guarantee when the
> > high-priority table will be cleaned up ...
> Based on the criticism voiced and a quick skim of the proposal, this
> CF entry appears to still be in its design phase. In my opinion this
> thus isn't v11 material, and should be marked as 'returned with
Hi, I agree, this patch definitely needs more thinking.
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company