On 03/02/2018 09:21 PM, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/2/18 3:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Ah, apologies - that's due to moving the patch from the last CF (it was
>>> marked as RWF so I had to reopen it before moving it). I'll submit a new
>>> version of the patch shortly, please mark it as WOA until then.
>> So, the way it's supposed to work is you resubmit the patch first and
>> then re-activate the CF entry.  If you get to re-activate the CF entry
>> without actually updating the patch, and then submit the patch
>> afterwards, then the CF deadline becomes largely meaningless.  I think
>> a new patch should rejected as untimely.
> Hmmm, I missed that implication last night.  I'll mark this Returned
> with Feedback.
> Tomas, please move to the next CF once you have an updated patch.

Can you guys please point me to the CF rules that say this? Because my
understanding (and not just mine, AFAICS) was obviously different.
Clearly there's a disconnect somewhere.

Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to