On 3/2/18 8:54 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 03/03/2018 02:37 AM, David Steele wrote: >> On 3/2/18 8:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On 2018-03-03 02:00:46 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: >>>> That is somewhat misleading, I think. You're right the last version was >>>> submitted on 2018-01-19, but the next review arrived on 2018-01-31, i.e. >>>> right at the end of the CF. So it's not like the patch was sitting there >>>> with unresolved issues. Based on that review the patch was marked as RWF >>>> and thus not moved to 2018-03 automatically. >>> >>> I don't see how this changes anything. >> >> I agree that things could be clearer, and Andres has produced a great >> document that we can build on. The old one had gotten a bit stale. >> >> However, I think it's pretty obvious that a CF entry should be >> accompanied with a patch. It sounds like the timing was awkward but >> you still had 28 days to produce a new patch. > > Based on internal discussion I'm not so sure about the "pretty obvious" > part. It certainly wasn't that obvious to me, otherwise I'd submit the > revised patch earlier - hindsight is 20/20.
Indeed it is. Be assured that nobody takes pleasure in pushing patches, but we have limited resources and must make some choices. >> I also notice that you submitted 7 patches in this CF but are >> reviewing zero. > > I've volunteered to review a couple of patches at the FOSDEM Developer > Meeting - I thought Stephen was entering that into the CF app, not sure > where it got lost. There are plenty of patches that need review, so go for it. Regards, -- -David da...@pgmasters.net