On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2018-03-07 14:10 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>: > > 2018-03-07 13:58 GMT+01:00 Arthur Zakirov <a.zaki...@postgrespro.ru>: > >> Oh understood. Tomas suggested those commands too earlier. I'll > >> implement them. But I think it is better to track files modification time > >> too. Because now, without the patch, users don't have to call additional > >> commands to refresh their dictionaries, so without such tracking we'll > >> made dictionaries maintenance harder. > >> > > > > Postgres hasn't any subsystem based on modification time, so introduction > > this sensitivity, I don't see, practical. > > > > Usually the shared dictionaries are used for complex language based > fulltext. The frequence of updates of these dictionaries is less than > updates PostgreSQL. The czech dictionary is same 10 years.
Agree. In this case auto reloading isn't important feature here. -- Arthur Zakirov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company
