Nikolay Shaplov wrote: > Actually that's me who have lost it.
Yeah, I realized today when I saw your reply to Nikita. I didn't realize it was him submitting a new version of the patch. > The code with oxford comma would be a > bit more complicated. We should put such coma when we have 3+ items and do > not > put it when we have 2. > > Does it worth it? > > As I've read oxford using of comma is not mandatory and used to avoid > ambiguity. > "XXX, YYY and ZZZ" can be read as "XXX, YYY, ZZZ" or as "XXX, (YYY and ZZZ)". > oxford comma is used to make sure that YYY and ZZZ are separate items of the > list, not an expression inside one item. > > But here we hardly have such ambiguity. Gracious goodness -- the stuff these Brits come up with! > So I'll ask again, do you really think it worth it? I'm not qualified to answer this question. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services