At Wed, 7 Mar 2018 07:10:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in <firstname.lastname@example.org> > Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > > > 1. some messages are missing partitioned table/index .. > I *think* the idea here is that a partitioned table is a table, so there > is no need to say "foo is not a table or partitioned table". We only > mention partitioned tables when we want to make a distinction between > those that are partitioned and those that aren't.
I agree with the direction and code seems following that. I should have looked wider. Thanks. > > 2. GUC comment for autovacuum_work_mem has a typo, "max num of > > parallel workers *than* can be..". (Third attached) > > Yeah, pushed, though it's parallel_max_workers not autovacuum_work_mem. Ugg. Inconsistency within a line.. My fingers may have decided to do somewhat different from my brain. Anyway, thank you for commiting. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center