At Wed, 7 Mar 2018 07:10:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote in <email@example.com>
> Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > 1. some messages are missing partitioned table/index
> I *think* the idea here is that a partitioned table is a table, so there
> is no need to say "foo is not a table or partitioned table". We only
> mention partitioned tables when we want to make a distinction between
> those that are partitioned and those that aren't.
I agree with the direction and code seems following that. I
should have looked wider.
> > 2. GUC comment for autovacuum_work_mem has a typo, "max num of
> > parallel workers *than* can be..". (Third attached)
> Yeah, pushed, though it's parallel_max_workers not autovacuum_work_mem.
Ugg. Inconsistency within a line.. My fingers may have decided to
do somewhat different from my brain.
Anyway, thank you for commiting.
NTT Open Source Software Center