At Wed, 7 Mar 2018 07:10:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <> 
wrote in <20180307101034.l7z7kqwqfkjg6c2p@alvherre.pgsql>
> Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > 1. some messages are missing partitioned table/index
> I *think* the idea here is that a partitioned table is a table, so there
> is no need to say "foo is not a table or partitioned table".  We only
> mention partitioned tables when we want to make a distinction between
> those that are partitioned and those that aren't.

I agree with the direction and code seems following that. I
should have looked wider.


> > 2. GUC comment for autovacuum_work_mem has a typo, "max num of
> >    parallel workers *than* can be..". (Third attached)
> Yeah, pushed, though it's parallel_max_workers not autovacuum_work_mem.

Ugg. Inconsistency within a line.. My fingers may have decided to
do somewhat different from my brain.

Anyway, thank you for commiting.


Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Reply via email to