On 10/4/21, 7:21 PM, "Stephen Frost" <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > This has something we've contemplated quite a bit and the last thing > that I'd want to have is a requirement to configure a whole bunch of > additional parameters to enable this. Why do we need to have some many > new GUCs? I would have thought we'd probably be able to get away with > just having the appropriate hooks and then telling folks to load the > extension in shared_preload_libraries..
That would certainly simplify my patch quite a bit. I'll do it this way in the next revision. > As for the hooks themselves, I'd certainly hope that they'd be designed > to handle batches of WAL rather than individual ones as that's long been > one of the main issues with the existing archive command approach. I > appreciate that maybe that's less of an issue with a shared library but > it's still something to consider. Will do. This seems like it should be easier with the hook because we can provide a way to return which files were successfully archived. Nathan
