> 10 сент. 2021 г., в 22:18, Bossart, Nathan <[email protected]> написал(а): > > I was thinking that archive_batch_size would be the maximum batch > size. If the archiver only finds a single file to archive, that's all > it'd send to the archive command. If it finds more, it'd send up to > archive_batch_size to the command. I think that a concept of a "batch" is misleading. If you pass filenames via stdin you don't need to know all names upfront. Just send more names to the pipe if achiver_command is still running one more segments just became available. This way level of parallelism will adapt to the workload. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Andrey Borodin
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Stephen Frost
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Julien Rouhaud
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Robert Haas
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Julien Rouhaud
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Robert Haas
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Julien Rouhaud
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Jacob Champion
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Robert Haas
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Bossart, Nathan
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Andrey Borodin
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Bossart, Nathan
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Andrey Borodin
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Bossart, Nathan
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Stephen Frost
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Bossart, Nathan
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Stephen Frost
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Bossart, Nathan
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Magnus Hagander
- Re: parallelizing the archiver Robert Haas
- Re: parallelizing the archiver David Steele
