On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:39 AM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Using fake LSNs isn't new.. how is this not a concern already then? > > Also wondering why the buffer manager would care about the LSN on pages > which are not BM_PERMANENT..? > > I'll admit that I might certainly be missing something here.
Oh, FlushBuffer has a guard against this case in it. I hadn't realized that. Sorry for the noise. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
