On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:35 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > It returns true in the above condition but it should return false > since the index doesn't support parallel index cleanup at all. It > seems that this bug was introduced by commit b4af70cb21 (therefore > exists only in PG14) which flipped the return values of this function > but missed one place. The index AMs that don't support parallel index > cleanup at all are affected by this bug. Among the supported index AM > in the core, hash indexes are affected but since they just return the > number of blocks during vacuumcleanup it would not become a serious > consequence. > > I've attached a patch to fix it.
I pushed your fix just now. Thanks -- Peter Geoghegan
