On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:53 AM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:35 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It returns true in the above condition but it should return false > > since the index doesn't support parallel index cleanup at all. It > > seems that this bug was introduced by commit b4af70cb21 (therefore > > exists only in PG14) which flipped the return values of this function > > but missed one place. The index AMs that don't support parallel index > > cleanup at all are affected by this bug. Among the supported index AM > > in the core, hash indexes are affected but since they just return the > > number of blocks during vacuumcleanup it would not become a serious > > consequence. > > > > I've attached a patch to fix it. > > I pushed your fix just now.
Thanks! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
