On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:34 AM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2) I think "which is enough because the target process for logging of > > backtrace is a backend" isn't valid anymore with 0002, righit? Please > > remove it. > > + * to call this function if we see PrintBacktracePending set. It is called > > from > > + * CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() or from process specific interrupt handlers, > > which is > > + * enough because the target process for logging of backtrace is a backend. > > > > > Thanks for the comments, v11 patch attached at [1] has the changes for > > > the same. > > Modified
I don't see the above change in v12. Am I missing something? I still see the comment "It is called from CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), which is enough because the target process for logging of backtrace is a backend.". + * ProcessPrintBacktraceInterrupt - Perform logging of backtrace of this + * backend process. + * + * Any backend that participates in ProcSignal signaling must arrange + * to call this function if we see PrintBacktracePending set. + * It is called from CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), which is enough because + * the target process for logging of backtrace is a backend. + */ +void +ProcessPrintBacktraceInterrupt(void) Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.