> I agree. In some email threads Andres has been using "JIT" as a verb, > too, such as "JITing expressions" and such; that's a bit shocking, in a > way. Honestly I don't care in a pgsql-hackers thread, I mean we all > understand what it means, but in user-facing docs and things we should > use complete words, "JIT-compile", "JIT-compilation", "JIT-compiling" > and so on.
Earlier today, I did some web searches to determine how people spell "JITed" (Andres' spelling), and also found JITted, JIT-ed, JIT'd, and jitted. No one agrees on that, but it seems very common to use "JIT" as a verb. See the LLVM docs: https://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html -John Naylor
