John Naylor wrote: > > I agree. In some email threads Andres has been using "JIT" as a verb, > > too, such as "JITing expressions" and such; that's a bit shocking, in a > > way. Honestly I don't care in a pgsql-hackers thread, I mean we all > > understand what it means, but in user-facing docs and things we should > > use complete words, "JIT-compile", "JIT-compilation", "JIT-compiling" > > and so on. > > Earlier today, I did some web searches to determine how people spell > "JITed" (Andres' spelling), and also found JITted, JIT-ed, JIT'd, and > jitted. No one agrees on that, but it seems very common to use "JIT" > as a verb.
Yes: among compiler writers, people who are swimming in jitted bytes all day long -- a tough bunch if I've seen any. (Not that us here are sparrows, mind.) I meant that our docs are for normal people, not *them*. (I too was thinking about the double 't' there while drafting the above but decided to leave that concern out.) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
