On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:49 PM Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 03:34:27PM -0800, Zhihong Yu wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 6:45 PM Zhihong Yu <z...@yugabyte.com> wrote: > > > gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > > > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Werror=vla -Wendif-labels > > > -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 > -Wcast-function-type > > > -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv > -fexcess-precision=standard > > > -Wno-format-truncation -Wno-stringop-truncation -fsanitize=undefined > > > -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error -I../../src/port -DFRONTEND > > > -I../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o path.o path.c > > > > Patch v3 passes `make check-world` > > The patch uses the "LENGTH_VAR != 0" style in px.c, but it uses > "POINTER_VAR > != NULL" style in the other files. Please use "LENGTH_VAR != 0" style in > each > place you're changing. > > Assuming the next version looks good, I'll likely back-patch it to v10. > Would > anyone like to argue for a back-patch all the way to 9.2? > Hi, Please take a look at patch v5. Cheers
0005-memcpy-null.patch
Description: Binary data
