On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Alexander Korotkov > > So, I would like to clarify why could my patch block future improvements > > in this area? For instance, if we would decide to make btree able to > skip > > cleanup when some delete pages are pending for recycle, we can add > > it in future. > > > > Anyway, for approaches of this feature I agree your version patch and > your patch looks good to me as the first step of this feature. Agreed. I think we got consensus that this patch is good first step, which doesn't block further enhancements in future. So, I'm attaching rebased version of patch and marking this RFC. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
0001-lazy-btree-cleanup-7.patch
Description: Binary data
