On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 1:43 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > This fixes the observed problem directly. It also makes the code > robust against other similar problems that might arise in the future. > The risk that comes from trusting that scanned_pages is a truly random > sample (given these conditions) is generally very large, while the > risk that comes from disbelieving it (given these same conditions) is > vanishingly small.
Pushed. -- Peter Geoghegan
