On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 11:47 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:22 PM osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com
> <osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > (4) doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
> >
> > <row>
> > <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para
> role="column_definition">
> > - <structfield>last_error_time</structfield> <type>timestamp with
> time zone</type>
> > + <structfield>sync_error_count</structfield> <type>uint8</type>
> > </para>
> > <para>
> > - Last time at which this error occurred
> > + Number of times the error occurred during the initial data
> > + copy
> > </para></entry>
> >
> > I supposed it might be better to use "initial data sync"
> > or "initial data synchronization", rather than "initial data copy".
>
> "Initial data synchronization" sounds like the whole table synchronization
> process including COPY and applying changes to catch up. But
> sync_error_count is incremented only during COPY so I used "initial data
> copy".
> What do you think?
Okay. Please keep it as is.
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
