On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2018-04-06 23:12:19 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Daniel is working on investigating the isolationtester thing. See a mail > on > > one of the threads where initial indications were the "atomics with no > real > > atomics" (or whatever you'd call it) were to blame. We could redo that > > thing without atomics to get rid of that (and possibly should), but it > > would be good to figure out if it's actually broken first, so that part > can > > get fixed if it is. > > Is that an explanation for > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm= > gharial&dt=2018-04-06%2019%3A18%3A11 > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm= > lousyjack&dt=2018-04-06%2016%3A03%3A01 > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm= > sungazer&dt=2018-04-06%2015%3A46%3A16 > ? Those all don't seem fall under that? Having proper atomics? > No, sorry, bad wording. The initial indications were that, that's not the *only* indications. There is possibly/probably more than one thing. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
