Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (I'm also not real happy about the amount of time the checksum-xxx
>> tests consume.)
> The isolation tester ones, or the regular ones? Because the regular ones
> finish in << 30 seconds here, just wondering if that actually counts as too
> time consuming in this type of tests?
The isolationtester ones. Looking at longfin, which while not a speed
demon isn't real slow either, the isolation-check step was taking 2:05
two days ago and now it's at 2:48. That's a pretty big incremental
jump for one feature.
regards, tom lane
