Hi, On 2018-04-07 15:49:54 +1200, David Rowley wrote: > Right, I suggest we wait and see if all members go green again as a > result of 40e42e1024c, and if they're happy then we could maybe leave > it as is with the 2 alternatives output files.
At least the first previously borked animal came back green (termite). > I don't particularly think it matters which hash partition a tuple > goes into, as long as the hash function spreads the values out enough > and most importantly, the pruning code looks for the tuple in the > partition that it was actually inserted into in the first place. > Obviously, we also want to ensure we never do anything which would > change the matching partition in either minor or major version > upgrades too. +1 I've also attempted to fix rhinoceros's failure I remarked upon a couple hours ago in https://postgr.es/m/20180406210330.wmqw42wqgiick...@alap3.anarazel.de Greetings, Andres Freund