On 2018-04-07 10:14:49 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Can the pg_verify_checksums command be kept at least, please? 
> AFAICT this one is not contentious, the code is isolated, it's really
> useful, orthogonal to online checksum activation and argueably could've
> been committed as a separate patch anyway.

I've not looked at it in any meaningful amount of detail, but it does
seem a lot lower risk from here.


Andres Freund

Reply via email to