>>> Or those three columns always, sum_lag sum_lag_2, min_lag max_lag, >>> skipped, retried retries? >> >> What about this? (a log line is not actually folded) >> interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency >> max_latency >> failures serialization_failures deadlock_failures retried retries [ >> sum_lag sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped ] ] > > My 0.02€: > > I agree that it would be better to have a more deterministic > aggregated log format. > > ISTM that it should skip failures and lags if no fancy options has > been selected, i.e.: > > [ fails ... retries [ sum_lag ... [ skipped ] ] ? > > Alterlatively, as the failure stuff is added to the format, maybe it > could be at the end: > > [ sum_lag ... [ skipped [ fails ... retries ] ] ] ?
I like this one. interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency max_latency [sum_lag sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped [ failures serialization_failures deadlock_failures retried retries ] ] ] Best reagards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
