On 2022-Apr-03, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > What about this? (a log line is not actually folded) > > interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency > > max_latency > > failures serialization_failures deadlock_failures retried retries [ sum_lag > > sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped ] ] > > My 0.02€: > > I agree that it would be better to have a more deterministic aggregated log > format. > > ISTM that it should skip failures and lags if no fancy options has been > selected, i.e.: > > [ fails ... retries [ sum_lag ... [ skipped ] ] ?
I think it's easier to just say "if feature X is not enabled, then columns XYZ are always zeroes". -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
