> On 7. 4. 2022, at 17:19, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:17 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> What I think you need to do is: >> >> 1. In the back branches, revert delayChkpt to its previous type and >> semantics. Squeeze a separate delayChkptEnd bool in somewhere >> (you can't change the struct size either ...). >> >> 2. In HEAD, rename the field to something like delayChkptFlags, >> to ensure that any code touching it has to be inspected and updated. > > Here are patches for master and v14 to do things this way. Comments?
Yeah I think this should do it (compilers should warn on master even without the rename, but who notices that right? :) ) Thanks, Petr
