> I object.  And I'm negatively surprised that this is even considered.

I am also a bit surprised..

> This is a complicated patch that has been heavily reworked in the last
> few days to, among other things, address objections that have first been
> made months ago ([1]). There we nontrivial bugs less than a day ago. It
> has not received a lot of reviews since these changes. This isn't an
> area you've previously been involved in to a significant degree.

I thought all the points that you had raised in [1] had been met with
satisfactorily. Let me know if that's not the case. The last few days,
the focus was on making the decodegroup locking implementation a bit
more robust.

Anyways, will now wait for the next commitfest/opportunity to try to
get this in.

> [1] 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20180209211025.d7jxh43fhqnevhji%40alap3.anarazel.de

 Nikhil Sontakke                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL/Postgres-XL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to