Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> I don't get this. The executor surely had to (and did) open all of > >> the relations somewhere even before this patch. > > > > I was worried that this coding could be seen as breaking modularity, or > > trying to do excessive work. However, after looking closer at it, it > > doesn't really look like it's the case. So, nevermind. > > Well what I'm saying is that it shouldn't be necessary. If the > relations are being opened already and the pointers to the relcache > entries are being saved someplace, you shouldn't need to re-open them > elsewhere to get pointers to the relcache entries. Oh, okay. I can look into that. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
