Magnus Hagander <> writes:
> Seems simple enough and the right hting to do, but I wonder if we should
> really backpatch it. Yes, the behaviour is not great now, but there is also
> a non-zero risk of breaking peoples automated failover scripts of we
> backpatch it, isn't it?

Yeah, I'd vote against backpatching.  This doesn't seem like an essential

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to